USPTO serial 73470760
RAD-CURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAD-CURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL P. NOVICK
MITCHELL P NOVICK52 UPPER MONTCLAIR PLZP O BOX 876UPPER MONTCLAIR, NJ 07043Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | ULTRAVIOLET CURABLE COATINGS; INKS; AND ADDITIVES, NAMELY - FLOW CONTROL ADDITIVES (TO AVOID THE FORMATION OF CRATERS, BUBBLES AND STREAKS, THEREBY PRODUCING SMOOTH, UNIFORM-THICKNESS COATINGS AND INKS), PIGMENT CONCENTRATES (TO ADD COLOR TO COATINGS AND INKS), REACTIVE DILUENTS (TO LOWER THE VISCOSITY AND THEREBY PRODUCE BETTER FLOW IN COATINGS AND INKS), AND CURE ACCELERATORS (TO ACCELERATE THE CURING PROCESS IN COATINGS AND INKS); FOR USE IN GRAPHIC ARTS, PRINTING, SURFACE-DECORATION, AND SURFACE-PROTECTION APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | Mar 12, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |