Drawing for OCEAN DRIVE

USPTO serial 73471338

OCEAN DRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCEAN DRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CORT R. FLINT

CORT FLINT ATTORNEY AT LAW, PA110 WILLIAMS STGREENVILLE, SC 29601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY BANDANASABANDONEDMar 16, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 1985ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 1985PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 1985NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance