USPTO serial 73472260
I.B.C. INC., U.S.A. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS CONSULTANTS INC., U.S.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I.B.C. INC., U.S.A. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS CONSULTANTS INC., U.S.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS W. SPRINKLE
GIFFORD, VANOPHEM, SHERIDAN SPRINKLE & NABOZNY, PC280 N WOODWARDSTE 210BIRMINGHAM, MI 48011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | EXPORT BUSINESS CONSULTING | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 12, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 15, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 1, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |