USPTO serial 73472751
TECHNEPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNEPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRACE J. FISHEL
GRACE J FISHEL675 MCDONNELL BLVDP O BOX 5840ST LOUIS, MO 63134Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MULTI-UNIT DISPENSER FOR DISPENSING TECHNETIUM-99M DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR IN VIVO USE IN ORGAN IMAGING, THE UNIT BEING SOLD WITH THE REAGENTS | ABANDONED | Oct 6, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 17, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |