USPTO serial 73472890
FLITE-LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLITE-LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM T. ESTABROOK
KEMON AND ESTABROOK2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 503ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | TIRES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES | ABANDONED | Sep 2, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 6, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |