Drawing for SMARTMODEM 1200

USPTO serial 73472926

SMARTMODEM 1200

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KURZBARD, MYRA K.
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTMODEM 1200?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EUGENE S. ZIMMER

JONES & ASKEWP O BOX 56326ATLANTA, GA 30343UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PERIPHERAL DEVICES FOR COMPUTERS, NAMELY, MODEMSABANDONEDJul 28, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 28, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 1987EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
May 8, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 8, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 4, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 2, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 11, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 4, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 4, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 12, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance