USPTO serial 73473360
BANACOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BANACOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BANACOM AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED
KINGS CROSS. N.S.W. 2011, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL H. KANE
KANE, DALSIMER, KANE SULLIVAN AND KURUCZ420 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10170-0071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, AND COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TERMINALS AND COMPUTER PRINTERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1986 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |