USPTO serial 73474256
BUTTERMILK BLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUTTERMILK BLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DALLAS, TX
MOONACHIE, NJ
WHITE PLAINS, NY
WHITE PLAINS, NY
CONAGRA FOODS PACKAGED FOODS COMPANY, INC.
OMAHA, NE
Other trademarks owned by CONAGRA FOODS PACKAGED FOODS COMPANY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Bourget
ANTHONY J BOURGET BOURGETLAW.COMPO BOX 81EAU CLAIRE, WI 54702-0081UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHEESE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 17, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DCI CHEESE COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DORMAN-ROTH FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONAGRA FOODS PACKAGED FOODS COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named BUTTERMILK BLUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 30, 1992 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 26, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |