USPTO serial 73475124
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
AUTOMATED INSURANCE RESOURCE SYSTEMS, INC.
NAPERVILLE, IL
Other trademarks owned by AUTOMATED INSURANCE RESOURCE SYSTEMS, INC.
AUTOMATED INSURANCE RATING SERVICES INC.
NAPERVILLE, IL
Other trademarks owned by AUTOMATED INSURANCE RATING SERVICES INC.
AUTOMATED INSURANCE RESOURCE SYSTEMS, INC.
NAPERVILLE, IL
Other trademarks owned by AUTOMATED INSURANCE RESOURCE SYSTEMS, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI
BAKER & MCKENZIE2800 PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CUSTOM DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO THE SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS FOR USE IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY, LEASING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE AUTOMATED CALCULATION OF INSURANCE PREMIUMS FOR COMMERCIAL LINES OF INSURANCE | ABANDONED | May 15, 1982 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1988 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |