USPTO serial 73476337
SWISS SILK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHALLANT, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWISS SILK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD H. ZAITLEN
SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS & LUBITZ1880 CENTURY PARK ESTE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR SHAMPOO AND CONDITIONERS | ABANDONED | Feb 17, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 25, 1986 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 3, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |