USPTO serial 73478458
SEGMENTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEGMENTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD D. CONARD
BARNES & THORNBURG1313 MERCHANTS BANK BLDG11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERFORMING MARKETING SEGMENT ANALYSES, RELATIVE DIFFERENTIAL ADVANTAGE ANALYSES ON COMPETING PRODUCTS, ANALYSES OF MARKET RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN MARKETING MIXES AND ANALYSES OF MARKET RESPONSES TO NEW PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | Mar 29, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 6, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |