USPTO serial 73479214
CACTUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CACTUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
ABELMAN FRAYNE & REZAC708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | LADIES' READY-TO-WEAR GARMENTS, NAMELY, DRESSES, SUITS, KNITTED SWEATERS, KNITTED COATS, KNITTED HATS, COATS, FUR COATS, FUR HATS AND FUR JACKETS; LADIES' READY-TO-WEAR SPORTSWEAR, NAMELY, PANTS, JEANS, TOPS (BLOUSES, T-SHIRTS), SHORTS, JACKETS AND SKIRTS; LADIES' ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BELTS, SCARVES, SPORTS HATS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 10, 1983 |
| 042 | RETAIL CLOTHING STORE SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 10, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DALMYS (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DALMYS (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DALMYS (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CACTUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1994 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |