USPTO serial 73480477
MENU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MENU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MEDOLLA, MODENA, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BOYNTON P. LIVINGSTON
MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCE310 OFC BLDG1730 RHODE ISLAND AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CANNELONI, RAVIOLI AND PASTA; SOUPS, PREPARATIONS FOR BROTHS, MINESTRONE; SOUP AND MEAT SEASONINGS; RAGOUT; BEEF STEW; TOMATO SAUCE; VENISON, HARE AND TONGUE; STEWED PRESERVED AND PREPARED MUSHROOMS, BEANS, ARTICHOKES AND ONIONS; TRIPE; VEGETABLE SALADS AND ANTIPASTOS; ARTICHOKE SAUCE, COCKTAIL SAUCE, TARTAR SAUCE, SAUCES FOR MEATS, FISH, POULTRY, EGGS AND PASTA | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | CREME CARAMEL; PUDDINGS; FRUIT TOPPINGS; FLAVOUR COMPOUNDS FOR WHIPPING CREAM, CAKE TOPPINGS AND COFFEE; ICE CREAM; MAYONNAISE-BASED SAUCE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |