USPTO serial 73481089
STEINEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEINEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-4836 HERZEBROCK, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD J. KINNEY
HAROLD J KINNEYSTE 1500625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HAND-HELD ELECTRICAL TEST DEVICES, ELECTRICAL HOT MELT GLUE GUNS, HAND-HELD ELECTRICAL HOT AIR GUNS, ELECTRICALLY HEATED CUTTING TOOLS FOR CUTTING PLASTIC FOAM, ELECTRICAL HEATING ELEMENTS AND HAND-HELD VACUUM CLEANERS | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 1983 |
| 011 | HAND HELD ELECTRIC HEATING GUNS FOR USE IN PAINT DRYING AND REMOVAL, THAWING FROZEN SURFACES, SOFTENING ADHESIVES, AND REMOVING TILES; ELECTRICAL HEATING ELEMENTS FOR USE IN HAND HELD ELECTRICAL HEATING GUNS AND ELECTRICAL HOT MELT GLUE GUNS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |