Drawing for CONCURRENT DOS

USPTO serial 73481894

CONCURRENT DOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCURRENT DOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID E. LOVEJOY

FLIESLER, DUBB, MEYER & LOVEJOYFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 1740SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS RECORDED ON DISKABANDONEDMar 7, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 24, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 14, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 8, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 24, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 11, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance