USPTO serial 73482065
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY B. ASKEW
JONES & ASKEWP O BOX 56326ATLANTA, GA 30343UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | FOLEY CATHETERS, URETERAL CATHETERS, GLAND CATHETERS, EXTERNAL CATHETERS AND CONNECTING TUBES, ENDOTRACHEAL TUBES AND CONNECTORS, INCONTINENCE PRODUCTS COMPRISING LEG BAGS, URINARY DRAINAGE BAGS, LATEX AND PLASTIC BRIEFS, URINARY DIVERSION DEVICES, COLOSTOMY POUCHES, AND PESSARIES SYRINGES, KITS FOR PREPARING PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL OR UROLOGICAL PROCEDURES (CATHETERIZATION) CONTAINING POVIDONE IODINE SOLUTION, PREPARATION CUP, RAYON BALLS, PLATIC FORCEPS, VINYL GLOVES, LUBRICANT, SYRINGE PRE-FILLED WITH WATER, SPECIMEN CONTAINER, UNDERPAD, FINESTRATED DRAPE, BENZALKNLUM CHRLORIDE-SATURATED SWABS, FOLEY CATHETER, CASTILLE SOAP, AND TOWELETTES, URINARY AND OSTOMY APPLIANCES, ANESTHESIOLOGY AIRWAYS, ESOPHAGEAL BOUGIES AND TUBES, INTESTINAL AND STOMACH TUBES, PENROSE DRAINS, FILLIFORMS AND FOLLOWERS, CATHETER STYLETS AND PLUGS, POST NASAL TUBES AND ASPIRATORS, ICE BAGS, INVALID RINGS CONSISTING OF AN INFLATABLE RUBBER DOUGHNUT-SHAPED RING FOR USE BY PATIENTS WITH RECTAL PROBLEMS, CRUTCH TIPS, GRIPS AND PADS; FINGER COTS; AND BLOOD PRESSURE BAGS ANG BULBS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 21, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |