USPTO serial 73482900
PRESHIPMENT PLANNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1382862Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- EXECUTIVE ACCESS
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRESHIPMENT PLANNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARTH X DEROSA
BARTH X. DEROSA Dickinson Wright PLLC1901 L Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS RELATING TO THE CONSOLIDATION OF FREIGHT AND THE SELECTION OF FREIGHT CARRIERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DISTRIBUTION SCIENCES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LOGILITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DISTRIBUTION SCIENCES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PRESHIPMENT PLANNING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 18, 1991 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 23, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |