USPTO serial 73483102
BRETON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRETON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KITCHENER, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. GIPPLE
GIPPLE & HALEP O BOX 40513WASHINGTON, DC 20016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CRACKERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 7, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |