USPTO serial 73484841
INTEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1456189Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H. COULT
JOHN H COULT1000 MILWAUKEE AVEGLENVIEW, IL 60025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION UNITS CAPABLE OF TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING INTELLIGIBLE ELECTRONIC SIGNALS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSORS, ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION FASCIMILE UNITS, ELECTRONIC PRINTERS, ELECTRONIC DATA GRAPHIC TABLETS, ELECTRONIC DATA PLOTTERS, AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSOR PERIPHERAL UNITS, WITH MEANS FOR REDUCING UNDESIRABLE ELECTROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1983 |
| 037 | REMODELING, REWORKING AND REPAIRING OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT TO REDUCE UNDESIRABLE AND POTENTIALLY COMPROMISING ELECTROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEQ, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by ZENITH/INTEQ, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZENITH/INTEQ, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZENITH/INTEQ, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named INTEQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1995 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 13, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1986 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |