USPTO serial 73486109
POLYPREL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 1985
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POLYPREL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
IVYLAND, PA, US
ACTON, MA, US
ACTON, MA, US
Action, MA, US
IVYLAND, PA, US
DAVIDSON, NC, US
ARVADA, CO, US
ACTON, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. McAllister
Terrence J. McAllister Ohland, Greeley, Ruggiero, Perle, L.L.P.One Landmark Square, 10th FloorStamford, CT 06901-2682UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | [ COATINGS, ] O-RINGS, SEAL RINGS, GASKETS, DIAPHRAGMS [, LINERS, NOZZLES, COUPLING NUTS AND TUBING ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 4, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MILTON ROY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LIQUID METRONICS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by LIQUID METRONICS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by LIQUID METRONICS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MILTON ROY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by MILTON ROY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MILTON ROY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by LIQUID METRONICS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named POLYPREL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 2, 1992 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 30, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |