USPTO serial 73488985
THE SINK FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 1986
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THE SINK FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERKELEY, CA
BERKELEY, CA
BERKELEY, CA
BERKELEY, CA
BERKELEY, CA
BERKELEY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE J. BIELEN, JR.
THEODORE J. BIELEN, JR. BIELEN & LAMPE1390 WILLOW PASS RD STE 1020CONCORD, CA 94520UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WASH BASINS AND TOILET TANKS | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SINK FACTORY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BORESEN, RAGNAR
- Other trademarks owned by SINK FACTORY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by SINK FACTORY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BORESEN, RAGNAR
- Other trademarks owned by SINK FACTORY, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named THE SINK FACTORY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 23, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 21, 1991 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 1991 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| May 20, 1991 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 1, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |