USPTO serial 73490313
SMURF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMURF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM ANTHONY DRUCKER
EUGENE L BERNARD RAYMOND A KURZBERNARD. ROTHWELL & BROWN, PC1700 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | TOILET SOAPS, LIQUID SOAPS, SHAMPOOS, PERFUMERY, CREAMS AND MILKS FOR SKIN CARE, HAIR LOTIONS, DENTIFRICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1988 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |