USPTO serial 73490645
ALPACA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OMELKO, NANCY LOU
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPACA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL ALPACA ASSOCIATION
YANAHURA, AREQUIPA, PE
INTERNATIONAL ALPACA ASSOCIATION
YANAHURA, AREQUIPA, PE
FONDO DE PROMOCION DE EXPORTACIONES NO TRADICIONALES
LIMA, PE
Other trademarks owned by FONDO DE PROMOCION DE EXPORTACIONES NO TRADICIONALES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DUNCAN H. CAMERON
CAMERON, HORNBOSTEL1707 H ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTION OF THE SALE OF PERUVIAN ALPACA WOOL PRODUCTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL ALPACA ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL ALPACA ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks owned by FONDO DE PROMOCION DE EXPORTACIONES NO TRADICIONALES
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ALPACA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 23, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |