USPTO serial 73492227
CONCORDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONCORDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH D. BEECHER
JESSUP & BEECHER2001 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | STORAGE BATTERIES FOR USE IN MILITARY AND CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT AND SPECIALTY STORAGE BATTERIES | ABANDONED | Mar 27, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |