USPTO serial 73492662
ICE CREAM CANDY BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 7, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ICE CREAM CANDY BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD JAMES
ROBERT L EPSTEIN JAMES & FRANKLIN60 E 42ND STSTE 1217NEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FROZEN CONFECTION CONSISTING OF ICE CREAM, CHOCOLATE, CARAMEL, AND NUTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 5, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 3, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 10, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |