Drawing for MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS

USPTO serial 73492832

MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1366054Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 15, 1985
Examiner
—
Law office
—

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MICHIGAN INDUSTRIAL TOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jami A. Gekas

Jami A. Gekas FOLEY & LARDNER LLP321 NORTH CLARK STREETSuite 3000CHICAGO, IL 60654-4762

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ POWER TOOLS-NAMELY, PNEUMATIC SPRAY GUNS, AIR HAMMERS, SANDERS, IMPACT WRENCHES, AND AIR RATCHET WRENCHES; AND ] [ HYDRAULIC LIFTING JACKS ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 3, 1983
008HAND TOOLS-NAMELY, WRENCHES, SCREWDRIVERS, PLIERS, HAMMERS, SAWS, HAND RIVET GUNS, CLAMPS, PRYING BARS, [ TOOL BOXES, ] VICES, LEATHER PUNCHES, IMPACT DRIVERS, GEAR PULLERS [, STEERING WHEEL PULLERS, SCREW EXTRACTORS, AND FOOT PUMPS ]ACTIVEOct 3, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2026NP89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARTIAL SEC. 8 & 9 EMAILED—
Jan 19, 2026RNL3REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 19, 20269G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Jan 19, 20268PRTREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED—
Jan 16, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2025E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 23, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 23, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 21, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 31, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2006RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 9, 200689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 6, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 200589AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Oct 14, 2005E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 19928.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 11, 1992PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Sep 23, 1991815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 15, 1985R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 9, 1985CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance