USPTO serial 73493454
NET/MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NET/MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J. JOSEPHIC
WOOD, HERRON & EVANS2700 CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES NAMELY, ADVANCED NETWORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SERVICES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER NETWORKS, DISTRIBUTED DATA AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 9, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |