USPTO serial 73495164
LONG NAILS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 1986
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LONG NAILS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PICO RIVERA, CA
PICO RIVERA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES H. SCHWARTZ
ROSTON & SCHWARTZ5900 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 1430LOS ANGELES, CA 90036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MANICURE NAIL PREPARATIONS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY POLISH REMOVER, CUTICLE REMOVER, CUTICLE CONDITIONER, NAIL CONDITIONER, NAIL HARDENER, RIDGE FILLER, LIQUID FIBER WRAP, POLISH THINNER, NAIL GLAZE AND POLISH, TOP COAT, POLISH DRIER AND NAIL DECALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 9, 1984 |
| 008 | NAIL FILES AND ABRASIVE BOARDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 9, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1992 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 28, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 6, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |