USPTO serial 73496009
HEALTHY PET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1368410Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 1985
- Examiner
- CIPPARONE, MARY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEALTHY PET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. PAUL WEAVER
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MAGAZINE SECTION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 1991 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 27, 1990 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1985 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 12, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 1985 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 24, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |