USPTO serial 73496511
MAGNUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1393587Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 1986
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAGNUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. BRUCE PROUT
D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER-OPERATED WOOD, METAL, AND MASONRY CUTTING TOOLS, HAMMER TOOLS AND RELATED PRODUCTS-NAMELY, AUGER BITS, SAW TOOTH BITS, DRILL BITS AND [END MILLS], MASONARY DRILLS, REAMERS, [TAPS AND DIES] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 22, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGNUS INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGNUS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MAGNUS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MAGNUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2010 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 24, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 13, 1986 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 12, 1986 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |