USPTO serial 73496622
M.P.G.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M.P.G.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD S. TEMKO
TEMKO & TEMKO19 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | STEEL BURGLAR PROTECTIVE LATTICE WORK, INCLUDING AN OUTER BUCK ADAPTED TO BE ANCHORED WITHIN A WINDOW OPENING, AND A SWING GRILL HAVING A CONCEALED LATCH MANUALLY ACCESSIBLE FROM AN INNER SURFACE TO FIX THE ROTATIONAL POSITION OF SAID LATTICE WORK RELATIVE TO SAID BUCK, AND DISTRIBUTED AND INSTALLED BY LOCKSMITHS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 23, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |