Drawing for THE HIGH PERFORMANCE SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 73496782

THE HIGH PERFORMANCE SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HIGH PERFORMANCE SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL W. VAPNEK

PAUL W VAPNEK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWRONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS PRERECORDED ON TAPES, DISKS, DISKETTES, CARTRIDGES AND CASSETTES; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND PROGRAMMER'S REFERENCES AND USER'S GUIDE MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITABANDONEDAug 2, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 15, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 15, 1986EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 9, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 8, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance