USPTO serial 73496920
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MIAMI, FL
MIAMI, FL
MIAMI, FL
TRADING & DISTRIBUTION BRANDS LIMITED
ST. MICHAEL, BB
Other trademarks owned by TRADING & DISTRIBUTION BRANDS LIMITED
MEDLEY, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ
ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ, P.A.P.O. BOX 221470HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | EDIBLE OILS, NAMELY, CORN AND SOYBEAN OIL, AND CANNED FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CHICKEN VIENNA SAUSAGE, CORNED BEEF, CREAM STYLE CORN, CREAMY PEANUT BUTTER, FRUIT COCKTAIL, MACKEREL IN OIL, MIXED VEGETABLES, PEARS IN HALVES, PEAS & CARROTS, SLICED PEACHES, SWEET PEAS, TOMATO PASTE, TUNA IN WATER AND WHOLE TOMATOES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | IODIZED SALT AND CANNED TOMATO SAUCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | CANNED GRAPEFRUIT, TOMATO AND PINEAPPLE JUICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 13, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |