Drawing for "INTEGRATED DIGITAL NETWORK EXCHANGE"

USPTO serial 73498090

"INTEGRATED DIGITAL NETWORK EXCHANGE"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "INTEGRATED DIGITAL NETWORK EXCHANGE"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID E. LOVEJOY

FLIESLER, DUBB, MEYER & LOVEJOYFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1740SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMMUNICATIONS PROCESSORS, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS AND CABINETS THEREFOR, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, PRINTED DOCUMENTATION AND MANUALS, SOLD AS A UNITABANDONEDJul 19, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 26, 1986EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 11, 1986CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 22, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 24, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance