USPTO serial 73498301
TOFFU GLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOFFU GLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. BAXLEY
CHARLES E BAXLEY84 WILLIAM STNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FROZEN DESSERT PRODUCTS, NAMELY NON-DAIRY FROZEN DESSERTS, ICE CREAM, SHERBETS AND FROZEN YOGURTS | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 12, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |