USPTO serial 73498361
COLUMBUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLUMBUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALF H. SIEGEMUND
BEEHLER, PAVITT, SIEGEMUND JAGGER & MARTELLA1100 EQUITABLE PLZ3435 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90010-1978Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | SPACE VEHICLES, NAMELY SPACE SHUTTLES, SPACE CAPSULES, SPACE PLATFORMS, SATELLITES, AND SPACE STATIONS FOR MANNED AND UNMANNED USE; CARRIER ROCKETS, ROCKET DRIVES, AND PROPULSION UNITS, CONTROL APPARATUS FOR STABILIZING, I.E. ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACE CAPSULES AND SPACE STATIONS; SOLAR GENERATORS AND POWER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT FOR SPACE VEHICLES; ADJUSTMENT DEVICES, MANIPULATORS, ROBOTS, MEASURING PROBES AND SCIENTIFIC EQUIPMENT FOR USE IN UTER SPACE; ON BOARD EQUIPMENT FOR PILOTNG SPACE VEHICLES, COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR SPACE VEHICLES INCLUDING ONBOARD AND GROUND ANTENNAS; DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR SPACE VEHICLES AND GROUND EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING SPACE VEHICLES AND SPACE MISSIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |