Drawing for ELTROMAT

USPTO serial 73500193

ELTROMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELTROMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM T. BOLAND, JR.

KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICES TO BE USED IN PRINTING AND PACKAGING INDUSTRIES-NAMELY REGISTER CONTROLS, PRE-SETTING CONTROLS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION, AND MARKING CONTROLS, VISCOSITY CONTROL, AUTOMATIC CUT-OFF CONTROLS, EDGE GUIDING CONTROLS, PRE-PRINT LENGTH MONITOR, LASER COUNTER, LASER INSPECTION AND QUALITY CONTROL DEVICE, LASER BAR CODE INSPECTION DEVICEABANDONEDApr 11, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 1985ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 18, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance