USPTO serial 73500340
BIG PECKER BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BIG PECKER BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SEASIDE HEIGHTS, NJ
SEASIDE HEIGHTS, NJ
SELBYVILLE, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ
KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ JENNISON & SHULTZ P.C.2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | IMPRINTED CLOTHING AND SPORTSWEAR -NAMEL, T-SHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 1998 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 13, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 13, 1994 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 14, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1987 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |