USPTO serial 73500463
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH S. LITTENBERG
JOSEPH S LITTENBERG600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR ERECTING CONTAINER BLANKS, MACHINES FOR FILLING, SEALING AND CLOSING ERECTED CONTAINER BLANKS, AND BAG ERECTING MACHINES | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | CARDBOARD AND CARDBOARD ARTICLES, NAMELY, CARTON BLANKS, AND PAPER CARRYING BAGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | PLASTICS IN THE FORM OF SHEETS BEING USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PACKAGING CONTAINERS, INSULATING MATERIALS, AND NON-RIGID LAMINATES | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | TUBES AND CONTAINERS MADE OF PLASTIC OR PLASTIC LAMINATE FOR PACKAGING PURPOSES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |