USPTO serial 73500576
OHNO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OHNO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER M. EICHLER
COOPER, EPSTEIN & HUREWITZ9465 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 800BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PUZZLES, INFLATABLE BATH TOYS, PLAY HOUSE, DART GUN SETS, BOOMERANG, TOY GLIDER, KITES, TOY VEHICLES, PEDAL VEHICLES, RIDE-ON VEHICLES, SIT-ON VEHICLES, NON-ELECTRIC NON-VIDEO TOY PINBALL MACHINES, TOY WRIST WATCHES, DOLLS, TOY ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES, PLUSH TOYS, DISC TYPE TOSS TOYS, TOY FIGURINES, TOY BANKS, PUPPETS, TOY BALLOONS, YOYOS, BALLS OF ALL KINDS FOR ATHLETICS AND PLAY, HELMETS FOR ATHLETICS AND PLAY, EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING BOARD, TARGET AND CARD GAMES AND TOY KITS USING INTERCHANGEABLE DESIGN STICKERS | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |