USPTO serial 73500934
HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2022 SHARPE FAMILY IRREVOCABLE IP TRUST
DUBLIN, OH, US
Other trademarks owned by 2022 SHARPE FAMILY IRREVOCABLE IP TRUST
CIRCLEVILLE, OH, US
CIRCLEVILLE, OH, US
Columbus, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Standley
Jeffrey S. Standley Standley Law Group LLP6300 Riverside DriveDublin, OH 43017United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | DISPOSABLE DOSE PACKAGING SUPPLIES FOR MEDICAL AND RELATED FIELDS, SUCH AS UNIT DOSE BLISTER PACS FOR CAPSULES OR PILLS AND UNIT DOSE LABELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 2022 SHARPE FAMILY IRREVOCABLE IP TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by SHARPE, GARY L.
- Other trademarks owned by SHARPE, GARY L.
- Other trademarks owned by SHARPE, GARY L.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 5, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 23, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 4, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |