USPTO serial 73500992
LA FLAMME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1462865Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA FLAMME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH TRENK
WASSERMAN, COMDEN & CASSELMAN5567 RESEDA BLVDSTE 330TARZANA, CA 91356Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S AND WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, PANTS, TOPS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, AND SHIRTS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1991 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1991 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 14, 1990 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 1990 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |