USPTO serial 73501483
SMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman H. Zivin
COOPER, DUNHAM, CLARK, GRIFFIN & MORAN30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational Services Namely, Conducting Courses and Seminars in the Field of Continuing Medical Education | ABANDONED | May 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 16, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1986 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |