Drawing for INTEGRATED RESOURCES FOR INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 73501516

INTEGRATED RESOURCES FOR INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRATED RESOURCES FOR INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EUGENE F. BUELL

BUELL, ZIESENHEIM, BECK AND ALSTADT322 BLVD OF THE ALLIESPITTSBURGH, PA 15222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMSABANDONEDMay 15, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 1986ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 1986PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 1986NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 1986CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 4, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 13, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 23, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance