USPTO serial 73501605
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLAN S. PILSON
LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES, JAMS, EGGS, MILK AND OTHER DAIRY PRODUCTS, AND CHEESE, EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; PRESERVED, PICKLESAGRICULTURAL, HORTICULTURAL AND FORESTRY PRODUCTS AND GRAINS; LIVING ANIMALS, FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; SEEDS, LIVE P | ABANDONED | Feb 3, 1984 |
| 031 | LANTS AND FLOWERS, FOODSTUFFS FOR ANIMALS, MALT | ABANDONED | Feb 3, 1984 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |