USPTO serial 73501739
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
CYPRESS, TX
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
WILMINGTON, DE
CYPRESS, TX
CYPRESS, TX
WILMINGTON, DE
CYPRESS, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE C. RONDEAU, JR.
GEORGE C RONDEAU JR DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTSTE 2600, 1501 FOURTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-1688| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PRINTING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 19, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |