USPTO serial 73502703
DOCUVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 1986
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOCUVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BERKELEY, CA
BERKELEY, CA
BERKELEY, CA
LITTON INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Other trademarks owned by LITTON INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT F. ROTELLA
ROBERT F ROTELLA LITTON INDUSTRIES275 PATERSON AVELITTLE FALLS, NJ 07424UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SYSTEM USED TO CONVERT IMAGES IN PAPER OR MICROFORM INTO STORABLE ELECTRONIC IMAGES WHICH MAY BE VIEWED IN A VIDEO DISPLAY, SAID COMPUTER SYSTEM CONSISTING OF ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: DOCUMENT SCANNER, FILM SCANNER, OPTICAL DISC READ-WRITE UNIT, OPTICAL DISC STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL MODULE, WORD PROCESSOR, COMPANDER, LASER PRINTER, ELECTROSTATIC PRINTER, AND HIGH RESOLUTION DISPLAY TERMINAL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 18, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED AUTOMATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED AUTOMATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED AUTOMATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LITTON INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DOCUVISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |