USPTO serial 73502988
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON H. OLSON
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR610 NEWPORT CARTER DRSTE 1600NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ABANDONED | Aug 24, 1984 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1986 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 1986 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 1986 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |