USPTO serial 73503387
THE MONEYCLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE MONEYCLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAN R. MUSICK
DAN R MUSICK HISHON & RANNEY200 GALLERIA PKWYSTE 1500ATLANTA, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED NEWSLETTERS DEALING WITH FINANCIAL ADVICE | ABANDONED | Oct 4, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HUME PUBLISHING COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HUME PUBLISHING (1981) LIMITED AND HUME PUBLISHING MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THE MONEYCLUB
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |