USPTO serial 73503685
ENICHEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWELL, TOM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENICHEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N. ARONSON
LACKENBACH SIEGEL MARZULLO PRESTA & ARONSONONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN INDUSTRY, SCIENCE, PHOTOGRAPHY, AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, FORESTRY; ARTIFICIAL AND SYNTHETIC RESINS; PLASTICS IN THE FORM OF POWDERS, LIQUIDS OR PASTES, MANURES (NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL); FIRE EXTINGUISHING COMPOSITIONS; TEMPERING SUBSTANCES AND CHEMICAL FOODSTUFFS; TANNING SUBSTANCES; ADHESIVE SUBSTANCES USED IN INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | GUTTA PERCHA, INDIARUBBER, BALATA AND SUBSTITUTES, ARTICLES MADE FROM THESE SUBSTANCES AND NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES; PLASTICS IN THE FORM OF SHEETS, BLOCKS AND RODS, BEING FOR USE IN MANUFACTURE; MATERIALS FOR PACKING, STOPPING OR INSULATING; ASBESTOS, MICA AND THEIR PRODUCTS; HOSES PIPES (NON METALLIC) | ABANDONED | — |
| 022 | ROPES, STRING, NETS, TENTS, AWNINGS, TARPAULINS, SAILS, SACKS, PADDING AND STUFFING MATERIALS (HAIR, COPAC, FEATHERS, SEAWEED, ETC.); RAW FIBROUS TEXTILE MATERIALS YARNS AND THREADS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1988 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |